4 ms·

Google's definition is sufficient[0]. I'd also go so far as to say that LLMs aren't even AI, but that can be a bit pedantic. I align with Richard Sutton's reaso

by solumos 3mo ago

Google's definition is sufficient[0]. I'd also go so far as to say that LLMs aren't even AI, but that can be a bit pedantic. I align with Richard Sutton's reasoning, in that LLMs (and GPT models more generally) aren't "intelligent" in the same way that RL models are[1]. [0] - https://cloud.google.com/discover/what-is-artificial-general-intelligence https://cloud.google.com/discover/what-is-artificial-general... [1] - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=21EYKqUsPfg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=21EYKqUsPfg

anuramat 3mo ago
how is GPT more general than LLM? also it's not really "LLM vs RL", they're kinda orthogonal
- solumos 3mo ago
  Small-language models also use GPT. And I agree it's not "LLM vs RL" and that they're orthogonal, however, RL has features that more clearly resemble intelligence.