7 ms·
One interesting thing here, is they imply that both confidential personal medical information and confidential gov docs might have been compromised via the same
by bawolff 4mo ago
One interesting thing here, is they imply that both confidential personal medical information and confidential gov docs might have been compromised via the same phone.
Does EU parliment not have a policy of seperating work and personal devices?
- dewey 4mo agoHaving a policy and what happens in the real world are most of the time very different things (Understandably, as the line between work and personal time is often blurry).
- bawolff 4mo agoTrue but one would hope though that people dealing with national security would follow more than your average employee.
- throw0101d 4mo ago> True but one would hope though that people dealing with national security would follow more than your average employee. The more important you are the more you may think that exceptions can be made for you.
- seb1204 3mo agoThen it seems the person is not suitable if they don't understand the gravity and their exposure
- throw0101d 3mo ago> Then it seems the person is not suitable if they don't understand the gravity and their exposure So you're telling me / implying that sometimes people are sometimes promoted [1] or hired into positions that they are unsuited for? [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_principle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_principle
- drdexebtjl 4mo agoFrom what I understood, he took his compromised work phone to the hospital, and the concern is that it may have recorded conversations that contained personal medical information. He didn’t have medical information on the phone.
- rich_sasha 3mo agoIf you're off sick and need to provide a doctor's letter, at some point it will need to touch your employer servers. Just one example.