3 ms·
> This article is probably not accurate. AI allows me to create hugely complex apps. To prove the article wrong even within the context of AI coding (which was
by bayarearefugee 3mo ago
> This article is probably not accurate. AI allows me to create hugely complex apps.
To prove the article wrong even within the context of AI coding (which wasnt the focus of the article) you would have to present proof that creating these new AI apps resulted in you making lots of new money.
- consumer451 3mo agoI will not be providing proof here, but I went from someone who last wrote production code >15 years ago, to last week, a Fortune 50 demo client saying "this is far better than our internal tool." I am a solo builder. I feel like I am an outlier, but I do exist.
- chilipepperhott 3mo agoDid you make money from it?
- consumer451 3mo agoI am thrilled to report that after 1.5yrs of rice and beans: yes! The first client has paid, and signed a 3 year contract. Not huge money, but 5 figures per year. That client didn't even see what the F50 demo user saw.
- lambdaone 3mo agoThis is the crucial point. It has vastly increased my hobby programming "velocity", but has improved my day job performance by perhaps a quarter at most; so much in programming is not the task of programming, but mapping the problem and dealing with the outside world.
- kevin42 3mo agoYou'll have to take my word for it because I'm not going to disclose my private business or personal financial records. But, I'm running a small, two person business and we are being paid by a large company to develop a robotics project. We're working at a very fast velocity and have fielded a prototype within a few months. I've been doing this kind of work for years, and we're more productive than larger teams (8-10 developers) I've employed before. Five years ago, I would have needed at least 4 senior engineers to do the work we're doing now, and we're moving faster than we could even then. And I'm being compensated at a flat rate by a major company so we're making really good money. The customer is happy with the results. Claude easily writes 90% of the code we use.
- edukite 3mo agoThere's other word for such code and it sounds similar. It's crappy. I was tempted to use Claude couple of days ago to help me with optimization and from 4Gb RAM and 21s it managed to squeeze 1Tb and 41s. When I asked to fixed it AI reduced it to 1Gb and 10s. It just removed most heavy business logic. So yeah. 3 days and this was only total waste of time and cash
- bathtub365 3mo agoHow do you know it’s crappy? Have you read the code?
- deleted 3mo ago[deleted]
- ffsm8 3mo agoYour comment is strange, he clearly did in this context - that's why he knew what went wrong? Fwiw, I currently consider code generated by models below opus level borderline unusable. It really is horrendous there. With opus, it's still not good - but it's a lot better then some of my colleagues write. Well written code, carefully planned out and thought through is still only possible by either hand writing or holding the hand of the model so much that you may as well just write by have, as you'll be quicker. However, the code opus produces is good enough... So I rarely take action anymore in private projects
- edukite 3mo agoIn which world throwing business logic to "optimize memory usage" isn't crappy solution? Or making 1T from 4G? It didn't returned decent solution, contrary it was worst than terrible
- classified 3mo agoGuess who will be held responsible when your vibe-coded robot maims or kills someone.