3 ms·
it doesn’t have to be that deep or specific. all things decay on a curve. pretty much all things in life are not modeled by a straight line. so you’re saying
by apsurd 3mo ago
it doesn’t have to be that deep or specific.
all things decay on a curve. pretty much all things in life are not modeled by a straight line.
so you’re saying no theres still more UP. sure, but that’s a tale as old as time. when where and how much in how long is the reality piece.
- rpdillon 3mo agoWe still have far to go. You can tell by the pace if improvement in so many dimensions. If the popcorn's popping had started slowing down, I might believe you, but instead it's speeding up.
- bilater 3mo agoThe line is not just AI. It’s our whole story. You can extrapolate it to Moore’s law, automation, agriculture, and so on. And there's no decay. It's just perception. We are already in the singularity. We’ve always been. It just gets faster at each step.
- apsurd 3mo agoI've read Sapiens. And I liked it. It's very insightful. But that perception is a perception so I don't understand the distinction you're making. Human advancement is a story we tell ourselves. Agree. That it in any way looks like a straight line is just not true. If nothing else, it looks coherent after the fact... because it's an extremely lossy story our limited brains can comprehend. But it's not reality. No entity in the known Universe "comprehends" the march of progress. They weren't there when it started. So I just don't know what we're talking about anymore.