4 ms·
The actual paper’s title is “Markets are competitive if and only if P ≠ NP” It’s 2026, people, you don't have to use crude ASCII approximations of mathematica
by pwdisswordfishq 4mo ago
The actual paper’s title is
“Markets are competitive if and only if P ≠ NP”
It’s 2026, people, you don't have to use crude ASCII approximations of mathematical symbols any more.
- xxpor 4mo agoUnless and until desktop OSes make typing symbols not on the keyboard as easy as iOS or Android, I can't be bothered.
- adrianmonk 4mo agoIt's pretty easy on Linux with the compose key. To get "≠", you just hit compose, then "/", then "=". That's actually the same number of keystrokes as "!=" (since "!" requires the shift key). For whatever reason, the OS documentation lacks a list of allowed compose key sequences. But they are intuitive enough that you can find many of them through experimentation. For example: Musical sharp ("♯"): compose + "#" + "#". Interrobang ("‽"): compose + "!" + "?". Letter "ñ" as in "jalapeño": compose + "n" + "~". Copyright ("ⓒ"): compose + "(" + c + ")".
- classified 4mo agoThe "compose" key was a new rabbit hole for me. Very handy.
- VVertigo 4mo agoAt least in Debian (Trixie), I have a list in: /usr/share/X11/locale/en_US.UTF-8/Compose
- adrianmonk 4mo ago[Replying to myself...] Oops, I got one wrong. Copyright("©"): compose + "c" + "o". The one I had is bigger: Ⓒ vs. ©.