This seems to me like Ideology disguised as Tautology. "Saving = Investment" is an accounting identity and not a causal law. He shifts by implying that 'saving

This seems to me like Ideology disguised as Tautology. "Saving = Investment" is an accounting identity and not a causal law. He shifts by implying that 'saving' drives 'investment'. In accounting even unsold inventories are forced into the 'investment' bucket.