> No, that's quite clearly not good enough for an MVP! I think this speaks to the other major weakness of most founders: that they are optimists to a fault. Th

> No, that's quite clearly not good enough for an MVP! I think this speaks to the other major weakness of most founders: that they are optimists to a fault. The "MVP" in the story was a colossal failure. It wasn't "good enough." It was a disaster, and they should have just stopped there. But founders wouldn't be founders if they were able to know failure when they see it.