2 ms·
Ah, you're assuming distributed, which I wasn't. We are not at home to partition tolerance :) Makes sense in the context of the original post though.
by dcminter 3mo ago
Ah, you're assuming distributed, which I wasn't. We are not at home to partition tolerance :)
Makes sense in the context of the original post though.
- pragmatic 3mo agoBut you are assuming distributed transactions as soon as you have two systems participating in the transaction. It's a recipe for deadlocks and even live locks. That's a reason industry moved away from this. Bc when it works it's magic. But when the problems start it's pure hell.