3 ms·
> Because for me it's pretty simple, it's basically free to give access to reality. Just add "sensory organs" as it were. I dunno what you mean by "free". The
by lelanthran 4mo ago
> Because for me it's pretty simple, it's basically free to give access to reality. Just add "sensory organs" as it were.
I dunno what you mean by "free". The model is trained on text. To "give" the model sensory organs it would need to be trained on those sensory organs.
Current models can predict text, because that's what the weights represent. Models with sensory organs will need to be trained on the output of those sensory organs.
That sounds close to impossible in the foreseeable future.
- bonoboTP 4mo agoVision and audio is already in use in multimodal LLMs. So it's possible in the past.
- lelanthran 4mo agoWho said anything about vision and audio?
- bonoboTP 4mo agoThose are like the sensory organs.
- lelanthran 4mo ago> Those are like the sensory organs. Sure, in much the same way that veggie burgers are "like" beef burgers, and NES Duck Hunt is "like" clay pigeon shooting, or Dirt Rally is "like" driving a real rally race! But no one is going to claim that being good at Duck Hunt means you know anything about firing a gun, nor winning all the races in Dirt Rally is anything close to driving a real car.
- natureiskino 4mo ago>I dunno what you mean by "free". Reality is free. You don't have to waste any resources to model it, you just need to capture it. >The model is trained on text. See in my previous reply: >LLM/AI/AGI/whatever will be LLMs don't even have a sense of time because they work differently to a human brain.
- bonoboTP 4mo agoSense of time: just positional encodings on the tokens. Solved issue.