I think that’s wrong. Your wetware LLM already trained on and depends on the world, and your ability to use a silicon LLM is also part of you. If you discard th

I think that’s wrong. Your wetware LLM already trained on and depends on the world, and your ability to use a silicon LLM is also part of you. If you discard the products of your expertise by relinquishing any IP, and forgo the asset value capture associated with that, only accepting money for time, because you use a silicon LLM, it’s your choice but it seems dumb. Tho, if we remove bank from the question (you already have all the bank you need) - then I guess it makes sense. I guess i personally might not dedicate my time to building software in that case, tho the general service to humanity vibe resonates. Is this hypothetical, or are you fully bank satisfied? No need to answer if squeamish On the other: I don’t think bad software need be the result of IP. Nor lock in. I see it like developing commercial / residential property. You own IP assets and you can lease them or you can sell them specifically it’s like apartment buildings. The copies are the separate units. That’s how I see it and it seems the incentive from how I see it is with the vendor to maintain those properties. Keep them serviceable and up-to-date and modern. I have no experience with no taste for nor offer any support to the lock in idea. Though that attitude seems to be causative of bad quality than any IP ownership from my view.