3 ms·
It's a shame it costs more. I'm sure there are people who would like the non-wireless option, but would rather "save" $400.
by rationalist 4mo ago
It's a shame it costs more. I'm sure there are people who would like the non-wireless option, but would rather "save" $400.
- thih9 4mo agoEconomies of (lack of) scale.
- didntcheck 4mo agoUnless you need it for a high security environment that's limited to civilian procurement, why? I'm struggling to see a use case beyond that
- rationalist 4mo agoLess cognitive and screen clutter for one. Less things to break and cause unintended consequences. In other products: less weight, smaller size.