3 ms·
The comment was edited, originally it said "The problem with the DR part is that you miss a lot of detail" and I thought it was perhaps some term of art regardi
by pimlottc 3mo ago
The comment was edited, originally it said "The problem with the DR part is that you miss a lot of detail" and I thought it was perhaps some term of art regarding endangered species or conservation.
Anyhow, I believe it always adds value to bring clarifications "in-line" to the original thread so everyone reading it can gain the benefit of knowledge, instead of requiring every reader look up something on their own.
- bookofjoe 3mo agoI agree with you. Still, you're required to hope someone has enough good will and energy and time to do a solid for the HN readership if you take this approach. I'm not wired to be passive; for me, hope is not a strategy.