I don't believe that's what they were saying at all though. The claim appears to be that it's near lossless relative to their own baseline that uses float. Whic

I don't believe that's what they were saying at all though. The claim appears to be that it's near lossless relative to their own baseline that uses float. Which I'd grant, since a 32x storage reduction for 0.61% loss in quality is a reasonable trade off when you've already decided to accept that ~90% is "good enough".