3 ms·
Ha! So we were not looking at the same chart. That makes more sense. > Anthropic did post an official explanation, stating the original chart used a "simpler m
by theptip 3mo ago
Ha! So we were not looking at the same chart. That makes more sense.
> Anthropic did post an official explanation, stating the original chart used a "simpler methodology" that "underestimated Sonnet 5's performance." The new chart supposedly uses their "standard methodology."
Oops!