3 ms·

Too practical haha Maybe they just wanted hype?

• coldtea 4mo ago
  Or perhaps they wanted something theoritical that advances the state of the art in database design and architecture (which is the whole purpose of academic reasearch/conference/etc) - not merely some report describing doing something that's already been done for a different DB.
  • _zoltan_ 4mo ago
    that's a very condescending view from you, to be honest.
    • coldtea 4mo ago
      Condescending? That's the mission of a scientific journal / conference / etc. Doesn't mean practical development work is "less worthy", but it's not a fit for them.
      • _zoltan_ 3mo ago
        I disagree. I think it's very important to see how can those papers be turned into real things. Rejecting something for too practical is a joke, and if I ever find out who gave us that review, I'll have a talk with them.