4 ms·

Fetching any email content is always worse than blocking it, because the typical threshold for spam is "is this inbox monitored". If that is true, then blast it

Fetching any email content is always worse than blocking it, because the typical threshold for spam is "is this inbox monitored". If that is true, then blast it with spam. And fetching anything ever proves that the inbox is monitored.

layer8 4mo ago
My impression as a Mutt user (which never downloads linked content) is that spammers don’t really care about whether an inbox is “monitored” or not.
tyre 4mo ago
At least in Gmail, downloading content (e.g. images) is disabled by default for suspicious emails. There is no way for the sender to know if it’s monitored unless this is disabled by explicit user action.
- godelski 4mo ago
  This freaked me out the first time I used Mail. It rendered a PDF about buying bitcoin on PayPal (I don't have PayPal). Looked at the same email in Gmail and Thunderbird, it's just a PDF attachment, no message, and the sender was different. No wonder people are falling for those scams, Mail makes it easy for them. Now if only I had a better client on my phone (never buying an iPhone again)
  - bzbz 4mo ago
    What made you prefer Mail to Gmail, given you don’t seem satisfied with Apple’s Mail app?
    - godelski 4mo ago
      I prefer Thunderbird
- deleted 4mo ago
  [deleted]
deleted 4mo ago
[deleted]