4 ms·
I must admit I was drawn to Claude because of their (obviously successful with me) publicity stunt about "being too dangerous to make widely available", when My
by mnmx6t 3mo ago
I must admit I was drawn to Claude because of their (obviously successful with me) publicity stunt about "being too dangerous to make widely available", when Mythos came out.
It's a shame because I was really looking forward to use it specifically to find potential security holes in my own software.
That being said, Opus 4.7/4.8 have been quite useful already, especially for finding things in the harder to test, non-happy paths.
If I recall, Fable 5 is supposed to be basically Mythos which falls back to Opus 4.8 when dealing with cybersecurity. I wonder if that also includes "finding bugs that could lead to security exploits".
- babelfish 3mo agoYeah, I was very excited for Fable to come back to use it for work after using Opus 4.8, but now I guess I'm just excited for Sol/Terra/Luna (unless they have the same restrictions)
- gck1 3mo agoIt's very likely that OAI models will have even more restrictions. Firstly because now they know what feds will do if you don't tune the safety classifiers towards more false positives and secondly, OAI models were always more restrictive than ANT.