2 ms·
Sure, but its also run and operated by the rights holders, which they never even needed to do.
by giancarlostoro 4mo ago
Sure, but its also run and operated by the rights holders, which they never even needed to do.
- zamadatix 4mo agoIt's more "streaming/delivery operators which also have some of their own licensed content": - Disney -> Disney+/Hulu - Universal/NBC -> Peacock - Warner Bros. -> Max - Lionsgate -> Lionsgate+ - Sony Pictures -> The Sony services relevant to the article (note: the Sony services sell more than just Sony Pictures content) They never needed to, but it actually makes them more money because a revenue share model through Movies Anywhere makes sense. StudioCanal does not sell streaming/delivery services directly to consumers, a revenue share model between streaming providers would not make them more money, and Sony would have no influence on StudioCanal doing so anyways.