4 ms·
I, on the other hand, wouldn't support that because it's too often true that the submission is low value AI output.
by ThrowawayR2 3mo ago
I, on the other hand, wouldn't support that because it's too often true that the submission is low value AI output.
- inglor_cz 3mo agoIn that case, simply vote the submission down; that won't clutter the discussion for other forists who want to talk about the actual content. I think this is what the voting system is fundamentally for; we don't have to, and probably shouldn't, justify our votes aloud.
- b40d-48b2-979e 3mo agoWhat actual content? It's AI slop.
- inglor_cz 3mo ago[flagged]
- Karuma 3mo agoMost people can easily tell the difference between useless bot crap (like the article), and genuine human comments (like the one you're replying to). Too bad you and most HN commenters nowadays can't...
- inglor_cz 3mo ago"This is slop." sounds like something that a fairly simple bot could paste in every thread, with slight verbal variations. Sorry, I don't see the genuine humanity there, and I doubt that any double-blind experiment could nowadays distinguish between 10-word drive-by comments written by humans vs. AI. That is nowhere enough material to analyze and tell apart.