5 ms·
>For a Sean Connery movie it was bizarre Buddy, if you're trying to tell me it's weirder than Darby O'Gill and the Little People, I am going to need more than
by tclancy 4mo ago
>For a Sean Connery movie it was bizarre
Buddy, if you're trying to tell me it's weirder than Darby O'Gill and the Little People, I am going to need more than Sir Connery in a ponytail.
- SideburnsOfDoom 4mo ago> I am going to need more than Sir Connery in a ponytail Check out Zardoz: Connery with a ponytail, a pistol in hand, wearing thigh-high boots and a mankini. And a giant flying stone head that vomits guns. I am not joking.
- tclancy 4mo agoOh, I didn't need you to say more than Zardoz to bring that beautiful memory back.
- frellus 4mo agoYeah, with a movie like that in his credits, it seems a miracle he was ever selected to be James Bond. His radar for picking great movies was equally bad as it was good.
- stogot 4mo agoHe had to pay his bills
- peterleiser 4mo agoHa, yeah. Fortunately for him, Connery did James Bond first, then later did Zardoz and Highlander.
- tclancy 4mo agoI think he was one of those people that was acting to keep the lights on well after he was set for life. It's a mindset, especially depending on how you grew up.
- RockyMcNuts 4mo agoYou're the man now, dog!