6 ms·
If you understood the change, writing a short description of the problem and the fix yourself would be trivial.
by grey-area 4mo ago
If you understood the change, writing a short description of the problem and the fix yourself would be trivial.
- sixtyj 4mo agoEfficiency is the key. I haven’t written any issue before so LLM was much quicker than manual experiment. I have personally checked the result before submission. So why the hate? :)
- unfocso 4mo agoYou "personally checked" the result (generated by an LLM, a huge black box with extensive knowledge of all fields) to the best of your knowledge. There is a mismatch between what the machine knows (and has done as the result of it) and what you think you know. Implementing a fix implies knowledge of the inner workings that brought you to it. A fix made by a LLM does not give you that.
- sixtyj 4mo agoWhy do I argue here anyway? :) Before sending it I have tried the patch locally. It worked. So I sent the proposal. And it was accepted by the author.
- cyclopeanutopia 4mo agoEfficiency rarely is the key.
- chrisjj 4mo ago> Efficiency is the key. ... and includes the reviewer efficiency disrespected by your verbose bot.