3 ms·

Dario’s own mouth https://x.com/coinbureau/status/2071330294452666695/mediaviewer https://x.com/coinbureau/status/2071330294452666695/mediavie...

jquery 3mo ago
Yeesh. “What shall we do sire, when the peasants learn to read?” vibes
- entropicdrifter 3mo ago
  You mean to tell me that anyone can own a nail-gun? We can't have people buying their own nail-guns, next thing you know they might build things that aren't up to code!
anon373839 3mo ago
He has also been telling bald-faced lies about open source/open weights models that are easily disproved. For example, he claimed that they lack the collaborative benefits of open source because "we can't see inside the model". Open weights models are responsible for enabling reams of research on interpretability methods that do just that. And they have facilitated so much collaboration on architecture, inference optimizations, training and steering methods, and other topics that were completely out of reach with closed models like Anthropic's. It's really staggering to me.
- andsoitis 3mo ago
  Doesn’t this seem true / self-evident: “His warns that once powerful models are released openly, companies lose the ability to monitor misuse, revoke access, or update safety guardrails.”
  - anon373839 3mo ago
    The premise (that "powerful models" implicate "safety" concerns that must be controlled by "companies") does not seem true or self-evident to me. This tired fearmongering campaign centered on GPT-4 three years ago, a model now surpassed by open models that run on laptops. Did fearmongers like Amodei say, "Oops, we were wrong! It wasn't that dangerous after all"? No. Of course they didn't.
  - regularfry 3mo ago
    Either 1) the company has device-level control to the degree that they can not only restrict which API endpoints people can connect to but which accounts they use to do so (in which case this already isn't an issue); or 2) they don't, and all bets are off anyway, open weights or not.
ta93754829 3mo ago
that link doesn't exist anymore? what did it say?
- argee 3mo ago
  Strange, it opens just fine...as long as you aren't logged in (to X).
  - pmarreck 3mo ago
    What is the point of an X link that only loads if you are NOT logged into X? That's more fascinating than anything this link has!
- xeromal 3mo ago
  Works for me
pmarreck 3mo ago
This does not load (or no longer loads) over here.
- halcyonblue 3mo ago
  https://x.com/coinbureau/status/2071330294452666695 https://x.com/coinbureau/status/2071330294452666695

jquery 3mo ago

Yeesh. “What shall we do sire, when the peasants learn to read?” vibes

entropicdrifter 3mo ago
You mean to tell me that anyone can own a nail-gun? We can't have people buying their own nail-guns, next thing you know they might build things that aren't up to code!

anon373839 3mo ago

He has also been telling bald-faced lies about open source/open weights models that are easily disproved. For example, he claimed that they lack the collaborative benefits of open source because "we can't see inside the model". Open weights models are responsible for enabling reams of research on interpretability methods that do just that. And they have facilitated so much collaboration on architecture, inference optimizations, training and steering methods, and other topics that were completely out of reach with closed models like Anthropic's. It's really staggering to me.

andsoitis 3mo ago
Doesn’t this seem true / self-evident: “His warns that once powerful models are released openly, companies lose the ability to monitor misuse, revoke access, or update safety guardrails.”
- anon373839 3mo ago
  The premise (that "powerful models" implicate "safety" concerns that must be controlled by "companies") does not seem true or self-evident to me. This tired fearmongering campaign centered on GPT-4 three years ago, a model now surpassed by open models that run on laptops. Did fearmongers like Amodei say, "Oops, we were wrong! It wasn't that dangerous after all"? No. Of course they didn't.
- regularfry 3mo ago
  Either 1) the company has device-level control to the degree that they can not only restrict which API endpoints people can connect to but which accounts they use to do so (in which case this already isn't an issue); or 2) they don't, and all bets are off anyway, open weights or not.

ta93754829 3mo ago

that link doesn't exist anymore? what did it say?

argee 3mo ago
Strange, it opens just fine...as long as you aren't logged in (to X).
- pmarreck 3mo ago
  What is the point of an X link that only loads if you are NOT logged into X? That's more fascinating than anything this link has!
xeromal 3mo ago
Works for me

pmarreck 3mo ago

This does not load (or no longer loads) over here.

halcyonblue 3mo ago
https://x.com/coinbureau/status/2071330294452666695 https://x.com/coinbureau/status/2071330294452666695