2 ms·
Who cares about campaigning? It's whats happens after the election that matters: Does the representative represent their constituents? That's not an electoral s
by krunck 3mo ago
Who cares about campaigning? It's whats happens after the election that matters: Does the representative represent their constituents? That's not an electoral system issue.
Each eligible voter should get one vote of equal weight to all others. The EC breaks that.
- JumpCrisscross 3mo ago> Who cares about campaigning? Electeds. Where they campaign signifies who they think they have to convince and compromise with to earn their seat.
- ndriscoll 3mo agoThe EC doesn't "break" equal weights. The US is not a direct democracy; it's a federation of states. The states (semi-sovereign entities) get votes, not people. This is an explicit, intentional design decision. If anything, we probably need to better subdivide states, and in several cases, at this point large metros (e.g. LA or NYC) should probably become city-states with direct representation in Congress but a loss of governing power and senatorial representation from the rest of their (present) state. e.g. there's basically no reason for voters in LA to have any influence over the governance of Redding.
- rho138 3mo agoEven more taxation without representation, nice.
- ndriscoll 3mo agoHaving to contribute 3 months out of every year to a government that gives you a proper, even 1/250,000,000 say in how many more wars it starts isn't really any more comforting. The solution to that is more localized governance to limit the impact of all the crazies you live among, not a more direct democracy.
- rho138 3mo agoLocalized governance is great until Home Rule begins to get usurped by the next higher tier of government. Realistically there are a plethora of reforms that need to be made in order to rebalance the American project.