3 ms·

I'm not sure what you think all these people have to gain from tricking you. I have no internal monologue. None whatsoever. If I have something like an internal

I'm not sure what you think all these people have to gain from tricking you. I have no internal monologue. None whatsoever. If I have something like an internal monologue I don't have any conscious access to it at all. When I want to think through a spatial type problem, I can visualize shapes, images, rotations, relationships, etc but it has no verbal component. If I want to think through a text or verbal heavy task, like perhaps planning some code, I type it out. I do have intrusive thoughts but they are in the form of memories of a thing that happened or simulations of something that could happen, I guess. I most surely do not have an internal narrator or anything that approaches any kind of inner verbal life.

infinite_spin 4mo ago
> I'm not sure what you think all these people have to gain from tricking you. Asking for objective evidence of a phenomenon being self-reported by enough people to make the news isn't really about me. I don't know why you're being defensive in a thread that wasn't directed at you, but this is not a good sign.
- idiotsecant 4mo ago
  Weird that you go right to assuming everyone who doesn't agree with you is defensive. I think you need to recalibrate your outrage sensors. You said a thing doesn't exist. I pointed out that the thing does, in fact, exist. That's all that happened here.
  - infinite_spin 4mo ago
    > I'm not sure what you think all these people have to gain from tricking you. Your very first response is attacking me, not an argument I've made. > Weird that you go right to assuming everyone who doesn't agree with you is defensive. Your second response is also attacking me, not an argument I've made. > I think you need to recalibrate your outrage sensors. I'm not outraged at all. > You said a thing doesn't exist. I'm assuming by "thing" you mean "people with no inner monologue", and I have not claimed they don't exist, I made a statement concerning my disbelief. There is a difference. > I pointed out that the thing does, in fact, exist. Your claim that you experience this should be verified before we accept it as a scientific fact. If that were not the case, telepathy would be considered a fact. These responses from you have made me even more suspicious of the veracity of your claims. Again, not outraged, just wish to verify what is true. A person who is honest about their experiences, and has reported those as fact, should welcome verification.. you've clearly decided against that.

infinite_spin 4mo ago

> I'm not sure what you think all these people have to gain from tricking you. Asking for objective evidence of a phenomenon being self-reported by enough people to make the news isn't really about me. I don't know why you're being defensive in a thread that wasn't directed at you, but this is not a good sign.

idiotsecant 4mo ago
Weird that you go right to assuming everyone who doesn't agree with you is defensive. I think you need to recalibrate your outrage sensors. You said a thing doesn't exist. I pointed out that the thing does, in fact, exist. That's all that happened here.
- infinite_spin 4mo ago
  > I'm not sure what you think all these people have to gain from tricking you. Your very first response is attacking me, not an argument I've made. > Weird that you go right to assuming everyone who doesn't agree with you is defensive. Your second response is also attacking me, not an argument I've made. > I think you need to recalibrate your outrage sensors. I'm not outraged at all. > You said a thing doesn't exist. I'm assuming by "thing" you mean "people with no inner monologue", and I have not claimed they don't exist, I made a statement concerning my disbelief. There is a difference. > I pointed out that the thing does, in fact, exist. Your claim that you experience this should be verified before we accept it as a scientific fact. If that were not the case, telepathy would be considered a fact. These responses from you have made me even more suspicious of the veracity of your claims. Again, not outraged, just wish to verify what is true. A person who is honest about their experiences, and has reported those as fact, should welcome verification.. you've clearly decided against that.