2 ms·
Pangram says the text is entirely AI generated but I don't know how trustworthy Pangram is. (I would love to hear what others think about it.)
by eatonphil 3mo ago
Pangram says the text is entirely AI generated but I don't know how trustworthy Pangram is. (I would love to hear what others think about it.)
- Chu4eeno 3mo agoIt has extremely low false positive rate in various tests (e. g. https://arxiv.org/html/2501.15654v1 https://arxiv.org/html/2501.15654v1), I've never seen it mark something I knew was human written as AI.
- CharlesW 3mo agoFavorable benchmarks for Pangram exist, and it is one of the better AI detectors. But it's never been trustworthy as proof of authorship/misconduct, and it's getting less useful as models (and people's ability to steer them) improve. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/2026/05/pangram-ai-detection-accuracy/687381/ https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/2026/05/pangram-ai-de...
- ballon_monkey 3mo agoAt some point you're going to have to accept content is AI generated. There's heaps of stuff you probably read daily you don't even realise is AI generated.