The author is making a big mistake by making a normative claim about 'true' intelligence and consciousness. Is there a correct way to cognize? And although he

The author is making a big mistake by making a normative claim about 'true' intelligence and consciousness. Is there a correct way to cognize? And although he feels cognizing works in a very specific direction, his brain is basically doing a very similar guessing game on a deep level with training of pathways that started at birth. Basing the argument in a feeling about consciousness is not convincing. The author thinks they are describing a unique human magic, forgetting Augustine's insight that human thought doesn't precede the word, but is brought into consciousness by it.