> That he later worked on some legislation that was ultimately ineffective isn't a great defense. The in-effectivity was due entirely and directly to Trump int

> That he later worked on some legislation that was ultimately ineffective isn't a great defense. The in-effectivity was due entirely and directly to Trump interfering in the matter. How can a president sign legislation that doesn't reach his desk because the party in control of the legislative body is in the pocket of a man who cares more about his career than the nation's well-being?