3 ms·

slashing worker protections would do what exactly?

• eecc 3mo ago
  free the "animal spirits"? /s
• CalRobert 3mo ago
  Tbf it could reduce hiring friction and make it easier to take a chance on a riskier hire. Also makes it easier for workers to change jobs, notice periods here can be outright insane (3 months in some cases) and even as an employee I hated them.
  • someonebaggy 3mo ago
    Is a 6 month probationary period not good enough to take a chance?
    • CalRobert 3mo ago
      Longest I’ve seen in NL is 2 months, and it’s usually one. It’s common to string multiple “temporary” contracts together though. It still increases switching cost. As a worker with a permanent contract I have to weigh new opportunities against losing that. And it has real impacts! Getting a mortgage is harder on a temp contract (doable in NL, basically impossible in Ireland)
      • Timon3 3mo ago
        Six months is the default probationary period in Germany, I can't remember ever seeing a job without that. Temporary contracts are also a thing here, but if there's no objective reason for the contract to be temporary it will end after max. two years. According to Verdi ~1/13 contracts are temporary - not great, but could be much worse.
        • CalRobert 3mo ago
          This seems like companies will struggle to eliminate roles they no longer need if the person filling it has been around more than 2 years.
          • Timon3 3mo ago
            The two year limit doesn't apply if the company has an objective reason for making the role temporary, e.g. external dependencies.
  • ligne 3mo ago
    It reduces risk for employers by piling it onto employees, who are also probably in a worse position to bear it.
    • CalRobert 3mo ago
      Arguably this is the reason it should be borne by the government, not companies. This is one option https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexicurity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexicurity
• shmeeed 3mo ago
  You pick it. From what I keep hearing, it's a cure-all. /s