3 ms·
If you do 2FA without recovery keys or a recovery eMail, you’re doing it wrong. Everything I have heard from you so far is draped with ignorance and misinforma
by rekabis 4mo ago
If you do 2FA without recovery keys or a recovery eMail, you’re doing it wrong.
Everything I have heard from you so far is draped with ignorance and misinformation.
- PaulHoule 4mo agorecovery keys = "write down your password" which they've been telling us to not do for years recovery email/phone = same threat model as regular passwords, and it's a big crack, all the time somebody bribes somebody at a phone carrier to take over the phone number of a crypto whale Practically low-touch services are going to have to resort to these things, but they render 2FA performative. Now at work 2FA is OK because I can go down the street and show my face and ID to the people at CIT and I don't mind it for my bank because their cost structure lets me do the same.
- rekabis 4mo agoThank you for confirming my second sentence for me. Especially the first sentence of your response - “write down your password”. Wow. This is the worst possible take I can imagine. Like, this isn’t the 1980s anymore, password managers exist - even local-only ones - that can keep both strong passwords and recovery keys totally safe. KeePass in particular can be synced using server-free methods, keeping everything on-device, strongly encrypted, and essentially offline. I suggest you touch some grass and actually educate yourself. TOTP 2FA is a massive leap in security that brings the traditional username+password safely into the modern threat era. Provided that the password is long+strong and the username leverages dot extensions in the eMail (if an eMail) or is a totally unique username (if only a text string), said three-point security can reliably exceed that of passkeys.