3 ms·
Considering the cloud version, all three models compared in the article (Qwen 3.6 35BA3b, 3.6 27B and DeepSeek V4 Flash), have very similar performance[0], BUT
by XCSme 3mo ago
Considering the cloud version, all three models compared in the article (Qwen 3.6 35BA3b, 3.6 27B and DeepSeek V4 Flash), have very similar performance[0], BUT on cloud, for some reason DeepSeek V4 Flash is 10-20x cheaper than the Qwen models.
If Qwen models are so much easier to run, why are the providers charging more than V4 Flash?
[0]: https://aibenchy.com/compare/qwen-qwen3-6-35b-a3b-medium/qwen-qwen3-5-27b-medium/deepseek-deepseek-v4-flash-high/ https://aibenchy.com/compare/qwen-qwen3-6-35b-a3b-medium/qwe... <-- compare how the three models draw hamsters svgs, lol
- Gigachad 3mo agoAlso confused by this. Deepseek V4 flash is so much better than Qwen 3.6 yet cheaper to use.
- jingpostmedia 3mo ago[flagged]
- jboss10 3mo agoLook into deepseek's papers. They have done some stuff recently about improving inference and it seems to be how they can sell tokens so cheap.