2 ms·
If they always got the decay correct, we wouldn't have confirmed debris impact on the ground. It would be destroyed long before it reached. https://www.smithso
by shakna 4mo ago
If they always got the decay correct, we wouldn't have confirmed debris impact on the ground. It would be destroyed long before it reached.
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/after-fiery-display-spacex-debris-landed-washington-farm-180977494/ https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/after-fiery-displa...
- BHSPitMonkey 4mo agoThat satellite's orbit very clearly did decay, though. The problem in that instance is the descent wasn't controlled, but that's a different kind of failure than the one this thread is worried about (i.e. satellites lingering for many years without active collision avoidance).
- shakna 4mo agoDecayed without breaking down, is my point. There was a failure. Which means failure is a possibility and not something to just dismiss.