3 ms·
And to be sure, I agree Daniel is entitled to his opinions and the right to do with his money as he pleases. Of course there may be business consequences for do
by insane_dreamer 4mo ago
And to be sure, I agree Daniel is entitled to his opinions and the right to do with his money as he pleases. Of course there may be business consequences for doing so in terms of how the user base reacts.
I think the bigger problem -- and I don't know the rules for political donations in Sweden -- is that any individual is able to pour millions into a political party of any persuasion. In the US this situation is made much worse since a Supreme Court ruling known as Citizens United which opened the floodgates for the ultra-wealthy to bankroll politicians. But that's another discussion altogether.
- peterfirefly 4mo agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Party_finance_in_Sweden https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Party_finance_in_Sweden > is that any individual is able to pour millions into a political party of any persuasion. It's an even bigger problem that political parties are heavily subsidized by the state, which favours the establishment. This goes beyond purely monetary subsidies. Some people employed by the state have an essentially political function or have a large political influence over the population and they have been hired (and incentivized) by the established parties over decades.