4 ms·
I don't understand how $180k was enough in San Francisco at any time in the last 15 years -- unless you were partnered with someone with a comparable salary.
by waffletower 3mo ago
I don't understand how $180k was enough in San Francisco at any time in the last 15 years -- unless you were partnered with someone with a comparable salary.
- slater 3mo ago> I don't understand how $180k was enough in San Francisco at any time in the last 15 years Inflation. $180k in 2010 USD is just shy of $300k in 2026 USD.
- closeparen 3mo agoIt was enough for a single person in a good studio or middling 1BR with no kids, probably no car, and no desire to own property.
- bombcar 3mo agoAt some point the idea of working for $AI in SF just to enrich landlords and have a lifestyle that (at least materialistically) is greatly outclassed by some rural cashier at Walmart (3 bedroom house, family, car) needs to be thought about.
- nemomarx 3mo ago[dead]
- bitbckt 3mo agoI was single, living alone (+ 2 cats, if they count) in a one bedroom apartment in North Beach 15 years ago on a $90k/year salary. I even had a parking space and a car! I can understand how people did it then - I was one of them - but I don't understand how they would do it now.
- waffletower 3mo agoI guess you could rent something small. But could you afford a mortgage with $180,000 back then?