3 ms·

Of course it beats a native interpreter. WASM overhead is about 20%, interpreter overhead is about 1000%. What's cool here is to have a GameBoy JIT runtime at

Of course it beats a native interpreter. WASM overhead is about 20%, interpreter overhead is about 1000%. What's cool here is to have a GameBoy JIT runtime at all.

grashalm 4mo ago
It's two jits in total.
- ahartmetz 4mo ago
  True, but the WASM JIT is pretty low overhead because WASM seems to be a good design for what it needs to do. It's what I was referring to with the 20% overhead figure.
rnio 4mo ago
[flagged]