iirc the real point of contention was the "boundary count" rule. The super over ended in a tie, then instead of having a another super over the winner was decid

iirc the real point of contention was the "boundary count" rule. The super over ended in a tie, then instead of having a another super over the winner was decided based on who had hit more boundaries. I'm pretty sure this did lead to the rule being removed[1] [1]: https://www.cricinfo.com/story/no-more-boundary-countback-as-icc-changes-super-over-regulations-1203757 https://www.cricinfo.com/story/no-more-boundary-countback-as...