3 ms·
Perhaps. But just how human made? We already had the “Depeche Mode isn’t real music because they just push play on a sequencer” debate 40 years ago. And lots o
by brookst 4mo ago
Perhaps. But just how human made? We already had the “Depeche Mode isn’t real music because they just push play on a sequencer” debate 40 years ago.
And lots of composers can’t play the stuff they write. But the composition is human.
Then there’s emerging AI-supported music, since AI can come up with and test harmonic ideas far more sophisticated than most people. If a human’s saying “no, not that, try using an augmented sixth to get us from F#maj to Cmin”, is that human generated?
Not trying to be contrary, just saying the definition needs to be really clear, and that’s going to be difficult.
- keiferski 4mo agoWhat I had in mind was, "perform it on your instruments in our studio and we'll record the performance, record the music, and add it to our platform." Probably too expensive to scale, but... it's an idea.
- brookst 4mo agoSo, only physical musicians need apply? No composers, no guitarists who can program drum tracks but not play drums? I honestly like your intent. But we need to find a way to include people who can write sheet music for a symphony without being able to play most of the instruments.
- mapontosevenths 4mo agoArt is the expression of a person's unique perspective. The tool you use to do that isn't the important part, the communication of the perspective is. When AI makes that communication better it is good, when it produces perspective free noise, or steals someone elses perspective and paraphrases it then its' bad.