You're equating on-going expenses with new investments, which is just not the same thing. If "$2T is not as much as you think", and yet we could fund literally

You're equating on-going expenses with new investments, which is just not the same thing. If "$2T is not as much as you think", and yet we could fund literally tens of thousands of more interesting projects with this money, then we are severely misusing capital in general. My point still stands that we're pouring more money into a technology than ever before, and yet it's a technology that's been a net NEGATIVE socially so far.