As someone who uses Claude Code to summarize published research, you have to ground it in peer-reviewed results or it gets lost. But also, I am grounded with tw

As someone who uses Claude Code to summarize published research, you have to ground it in peer-reviewed results or it gets lost. But also, I am grounded with two degrees in the source material. So I am feeding it my views and asking if the published work agrees or disagrees with my opinions and I get fantastic results that way to the point of knowing current clinical trials and treatment regimens than most of the oncologists and which led to a great conversation with the clinical trials team. This doesn't replace people, but it augments existing expertise amazingly well. But also, I hear so many tales of running out of tokens. I ask Claude Code to build a tool to perform a task. I review the tool and then I let it rip if I'm happy with it. As I understand things, most just ask Claude Code to do the task. That seems a bit fraught. Anyway, you have to impose constraints IMO and ask the right questions to get the answers you need or yes Claude Code (or any other LLM) will eventually just agree with you.