2 ms·
> 2) Money needs to support that. Which means for Math, the money for math teachers needs to be competitive with research departments of banks, and very differe
by piva00 4mo ago
> 2) Money needs to support that. Which means for Math, the money for math teachers needs to be competitive with research departments of banks, and very different for different subjects, which seems offensive to schools and government in general. If teaching positions aren't competing with other professional careers in the subject matter, it will never work. This will, of course, mean that many science teachers make more than a school principal and even a district administrator. Deal with it.
I believe this to be a heavily US-centric view, Estonia and Finland do not pay more for math teachers than they could get in banks' research departments but still manage to get competent teaching across most school subjects.
Things work outside of the US, the issue is the US does not want to look outside and adapt itself to incorporate what's been learnt from other systems. It's a "do the US way or no way" attitude, and it's slowly eroding to become more a "no way" than any kind of "US way" of doing things.
- spwa4 4mo agoDoesn't change the fact that I have 2 daughters that are getting Math education from someone who is easily beat in math teaching quality by Google Gemini (I realize this is a specific strong point of Gemini, but still) And I do mean easily beat.
- piva00 4mo agoIt doesn't change that fact, unfortunately it's a complex societal issue which presents quite heavily in your society, it requires decades of constant improvement to change anything. I don't think American society has the appetite nor patience for the actions needed for this kind of change.
- spwa4 4mo agoThen the result will inevitably be AI education. AI cannot beat a good teacher, I know that. But the bar is getting raised a bit.