Your comment is very poorly phrased, but, yeah, I've found both the SystemD [0] maintainers and boosters to be very, very unwelcoming to claims that the way som

Your comment is very poorly phrased, but, yeah, I've found both the SystemD [0] maintainers and boosters to be very, very unwelcoming to claims that the way something SystemD does is incompatible with a totally reasonable and long-standing way to use a computer. As I've mentioned elsewhere, SystemD is great... until you hit a bug born of its accidental complexity, or you find can't do something because the SystemD maintainers -sometimes suddenly- decided that they didn't want to let people do it anymore. [0] This is shorthand for "The Systemd Project", not a slur against it. It sucks shit that systemd(1) and the project it's part of share the same name... it's very confusing. [1] [1] For a real-world example of the sort of conversation this confusion causes, check out [2] [2] <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48716382 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48716382>