3 ms·

> Energy only exists in quantized steps, it is not continuous. The fact that you think I disagree with this means you do not understand me, nor the idea of the

by Noaidi 4mo ago

> Energy only exists in quantized steps, it is not continuous. The fact that you think I disagree with this means you do not understand me, nor the idea of the wave function.

solid_fuel 4mo ago
> The fact that you think I disagree with this means you do not understand me, nor the idea of the wave function. You said > Yes, energy is quantized because we see it separate from a continuum. Because we SEE it as separate from a continuum does not mean it is separate from any continuum. This is the theory of everything is wave in a nutshell. It's not that I don't understand you, it's that you clearly don't even understand what you're trying to say. Right here, you say energy is not quantized but we think that it is because "we SEE it as separate from a continuum does not mean it is separate from any continuum". You are contradicting yourself because you are very far outside your limit of understanding.
- Noaidi 4mo ago
  > you say energy is not quantized Incorrect. I say when we see (measure) energy we separate it from a continuum (of probabilities) and it is quantized. Basic: https://www.asc.ohio-state.edu/mathur.16/quantummechanics27-11-17/qm1.1/qm1.1.html https://www.asc.ohio-state.edu/mathur.16/quantummechanics27-... E=hf...you do not get that E without measuring f. That is the quantum in quantum physics. And I think that is why we do not have a unifying law of physics yet, because this measurement is the basis for all quantum physics. We are trying to take particles to a place that is only waves.
  - solid_fuel 4mo ago
    > I say when we see (measure) energy we separate it from a continuum (of probabilities) and it is quantized. Read what you wrote. This is not what you said before, and it’s still wrong either way. Energy is not quantized because we measure it, it is quantized because it is quantized. You’re so far out of your depth here that no productive exchange is likely to take place.

by Noaidi 4mo ago

> Energy only exists in quantized steps, it is not continuous. The fact that you think I disagree with this means you do not understand me, nor the idea of the wave function.

solid_fuel 4mo ago

> The fact that you think I disagree with this means you do not understand me, nor the idea of the wave function. You said > Yes, energy is quantized because we see it separate from a continuum. Because we SEE it as separate from a continuum does not mean it is separate from any continuum. This is the theory of everything is wave in a nutshell. It's not that I don't understand you, it's that you clearly don't even understand what you're trying to say. Right here, you say energy is not quantized but we think that it is because "we SEE it as separate from a continuum does not mean it is separate from any continuum". You are contradicting yourself because you are very far outside your limit of understanding.

Noaidi 4mo ago
> you say energy is not quantized Incorrect. I say when we see (measure) energy we separate it from a continuum (of probabilities) and it is quantized. Basic: https://www.asc.ohio-state.edu/mathur.16/quantummechanics27-11-17/qm1.1/qm1.1.html https://www.asc.ohio-state.edu/mathur.16/quantummechanics27-... E=hf...you do not get that E without measuring f. That is the quantum in quantum physics. And I think that is why we do not have a unifying law of physics yet, because this measurement is the basis for all quantum physics. We are trying to take particles to a place that is only waves.
- solid_fuel 4mo ago
  > I say when we see (measure) energy we separate it from a continuum (of probabilities) and it is quantized. Read what you wrote. This is not what you said before, and it’s still wrong either way. Energy is not quantized because we measure it, it is quantized because it is quantized. You’re so far out of your depth here that no productive exchange is likely to take place.