4 ms·
> You would be paying a similar amount, and the money would actually go to some use, as opposed to being blown on a political fight. What? No. You're off by mo
by ivewonyoung 4mo ago
> You would be paying a similar amount, and the money would actually go to some use, as opposed to being blown on a political fight.
What? No. You're off by more than 3 magnitudes. He spent about 45 million, his potential tax liability under the new law is $60 billion.
- khurs 4mo agoalso replied below, but his would be 5% not $60bn
- ivewonyoung 4mo agoIt actually would be 122.5% for Doordash's founder, not 5%.
- khurs 4mo agothank you for providing a link to support your hard to believe claim...
- ivewonyoung 4mo agohttps://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2026-05-06/a-proposed-billionaire-tax-exposes-the-dual-share-racket https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2026-05-06/a-prop...