2 ms·
It only bans uncontracted oncall. If your job description includes on call responsibilities (and compensates for them appropriately), it doesn’t appear that wou
by swiftcoder 3mo ago
It only bans uncontracted oncall. If your job description includes on call responsibilities (and compensates for them appropriately), it doesn’t appear that would be a problem?
- theptip 3mo agoThis seems to be the crux, I couldn’t find a place where the bill explicitly says, so AIUI the rule making could fall either way. Are you “compensated for being oncall” if your contract says you may do some unspecified amount of oncall, and your pay doesn’t change if you do or don’t? You could imagine a judge / regulator deciding either way right?
- swiftcoder 3mo agoMaking companies spell this out explicitly in their contracts seems like a reasonable improvement to me