3 ms·
With regards to your other arguments: I'm talking about Digital Publishing (Magazines, Newspapers, eBooks, on tablets, see http://www.adobe.com/nl/solutions/dig
by digitalengineer 14y ago
With regards to your other arguments: I'm talking about Digital Publishing (Magazines, Newspapers, eBooks, on tablets, see http://www.adobe.com/nl/solutions/digital-publishing.html http://www.adobe.com/nl/solutions/digital-publishing.html ). Dreamweaver, Muse, etc play almost no role in that field because Adobe/InDesign are tied-to-the-hip with Postscript. Quark on the other hand is not and is free to utilize HTML.
- Volpe 14y agoHTML is inherently bad for print because of the pixel-inches transition... I'm not sure how quark gets around that, but it's a serious issue. What CSS/HTML does Quark support?
- digitalengineer 14y agoDon't know about Quark but InDesign allows you to create an RGB / pixel based documents (like Illustrator). Suppose Quark works the same way. It's all HTML5. Here is a tutorial I just found http://www.jamie-cross.net/?cat=26 http://www.jamie-cross.net/?cat=26 From a developer's perceptive it might suck, but from a designer's perceptive it's 'good enough' and better than static PDF files like InDesign creates.
- Volpe 14y agoSorry, I wasn't talking about the ability to create pixel based documents, and/or inches based. I was referring to transitioning between them. (i.e. normalizing your ppi of all your artwork and converting a pixel based document into an 'real' width).