2 ms·

> Where do you draw the line? If they want me to have some "special device", they pay for the hardware for me to have said "special device". My private phone

• lesuorac 3mo ago
  Seems pretty in line with a recent frontpost of "Pre-Modern Armies for Worldbuilders, Part III: Paying for It " [1]. There's a cost for everything and while you can "devolve" the cost downwards of a phone to an employee it's probably correct (in capitalism perspective) for an employer to pay for any tool they require so that the input costs are correctly correlated to the output price. [1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48689859 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48689859
• SoftTalker 3mo ago
  Take for example a university. Many of them seem to use Duo[1], which is not something you can replace with Google Authenticator or other TOTP app. They require it for students as well as faculty and staff. Is it reasonable for them to have to provide a device to all those people, forcing them to carry two devices around, and then also deal with replacing lost or broken devices? The cost of this would simply be added to the technology fee that students have to pay, when they all already have smartphones and could use the app for no additional cost. [1] https://duo.com/ https://duo.com/
  • bluefirebrand 3mo ago
    > Is it reasonable for them to have to provide a device to all those people, forcing them to carry two devices around, and then also deal with replacing lost or broken devices? No, but it's also not reasonable for them to only offer something that can't be used with other software. Use a different 2FA scheme