3 ms·

And where did they put it? On the biggest US platform. Someday we'll get there, someday.

by 12345ieee 5mo ago

hokkos 5mo ago
it's juste a model from Technical University of Munich not an official model from ENTSOE for TYNDP
- lyoncy 5mo ago
  It is actually an model that has been developed in collaboration with entso-e by Open Energy Transition. You can read more about it here: https://open-tyndp.openenergytransition.org/ https://open-tyndp.openenergytransition.org/
bcye 5mo ago
What exactly is the issue with that?
- Phelinofist 5mo ago
  > US platform
- greenleafone7 5mo ago
  He just told you; US platform.
  - davorak 5mo ago
    It can be hosted in multiple locations. I guess if the github UI becomes critical to their continued development or PR then they expose themselves to a potential rug pull by github/microsoft. I do not know much about the project so I can not tell if that is concern or if there is some other concern at play here or if those concerns apply to this project or not. Those are the types of details I wanted to see in the comment.
    - greenleafone7 5mo ago
      I don't think it's project specific per se. It's more the way Github has been behaving lately (it's not by accident that so many big projects are leaving), and the way the US has been behaving.
pvitz 5mo ago
If it were "the EU", it would be on https://code.europa.eu https://code.europa.eu
raverbashing 5mo ago
This is the type of pointless complaint that really go nowhere
dopidopHN2 5mo ago
I moved stuff out of github to a private codeberg while walking my dog. The moat on that is non existant.
- gmueckl 5mo ago
  The reason people cite when defending Github usually isn't the repisitory hosting itself, but the extra features like oull request management and issue tracker that also generate massive network effects by enabling the same accounts to participate in all public projects. Github is nore of a social network posing as a development tool.
  - tough 5mo ago
    check out tangled https://tangled.org/ https://tangled.org/
    - traceroute66 5mo ago
      Don't forget the little `alpha` tag next to tangled ! If I'm working in software development, the last thing I want to do is trust my coding workflow to an alpha-state platform.
      - dminik 5mo ago
        Surely can't be worse than GitHub going down every 15 minutes no?
        tough 5mo ago
        Also remember "git" is decentralized itself, you're supposed to have your git repo locally too, if PR's, or issues or comments are "alpha" your code shouldn't be affected by it at all Im personally down to try alpha software usually, i just havent found the need to retrain all my muscle memory to not use GH yet, as much as I hate it's owned by microsoft nowadays. They also do offer pretty good "free tier" services for CI via Actions that otherwise you'd need to pay yourself
_the_inflator 5mo ago
[flagged]
- nazgob 5mo ago
  Yikes.
nicexe 5mo ago
Git repos are distributed by design. I bet all the contributors have at least 1 branch (probably closer to an average of 3) of this project on at least 1 computer that they own.
based2 5mo ago
They must use https://about.code.europa.eu/ https://about.code.europa.eu/ https://code.europa.eu/info/about https://code.europa.eu/info/about https://code.europa.eu/explore/projects/active https://code.europa.eu/explore/projects/active

And where did they put it? On the biggest US platform. Someday we'll get there, someday.

hokkos 5mo ago

it's juste a model from Technical University of Munich not an official model from ENTSOE for TYNDP

lyoncy 5mo ago
It is actually an model that has been developed in collaboration with entso-e by Open Energy Transition. You can read more about it here: https://open-tyndp.openenergytransition.org/ https://open-tyndp.openenergytransition.org/

bcye 5mo ago

What exactly is the issue with that?

Phelinofist 5mo ago
> US platform
greenleafone7 5mo ago
He just told you; US platform.
- davorak 5mo ago
  It can be hosted in multiple locations. I guess if the github UI becomes critical to their continued development or PR then they expose themselves to a potential rug pull by github/microsoft. I do not know much about the project so I can not tell if that is concern or if there is some other concern at play here or if those concerns apply to this project or not. Those are the types of details I wanted to see in the comment.
  - greenleafone7 5mo ago
    I don't think it's project specific per se. It's more the way Github has been behaving lately (it's not by accident that so many big projects are leaving), and the way the US has been behaving.

pvitz 5mo ago

If it were "the EU", it would be on https://code.europa.eu https://code.europa.eu

raverbashing 5mo ago

This is the type of pointless complaint that really go nowhere

dopidopHN2 5mo ago

I moved stuff out of github to a private codeberg while walking my dog. The moat on that is non existant.

gmueckl 5mo ago
The reason people cite when defending Github usually isn't the repisitory hosting itself, but the extra features like oull request management and issue tracker that also generate massive network effects by enabling the same accounts to participate in all public projects. Github is nore of a social network posing as a development tool.
- tough 5mo ago
  check out tangled https://tangled.org/ https://tangled.org/
  - traceroute66 5mo ago
    Don't forget the little `alpha` tag next to tangled ! If I'm working in software development, the last thing I want to do is trust my coding workflow to an alpha-state platform.
    - dminik 5mo ago
      Surely can't be worse than GitHub going down every 15 minutes no?
      - tough 5mo ago
        Also remember "git" is decentralized itself, you're supposed to have your git repo locally too, if PR's, or issues or comments are "alpha" your code shouldn't be affected by it at all Im personally down to try alpha software usually, i just havent found the need to retrain all my muscle memory to not use GH yet, as much as I hate it's owned by microsoft nowadays. They also do offer pretty good "free tier" services for CI via Actions that otherwise you'd need to pay yourself

_the_inflator 5mo ago

[flagged]

nazgob 5mo ago
Yikes.

nicexe 5mo ago

Git repos are distributed by design. I bet all the contributors have at least 1 branch (probably closer to an average of 3) of this project on at least 1 computer that they own.

based2 5mo ago

They must use https://about.code.europa.eu/ https://about.code.europa.eu/ https://code.europa.eu/info/about https://code.europa.eu/info/about https://code.europa.eu/explore/projects/active https://code.europa.eu/explore/projects/active