4 ms·

Most Popular How-To Guides of 2012

96 points by patrickk 14y ago

Nux 14y ago
Wow, lifehacker's site is actually usable now without Javascript. Good job!
jbigelow76 14y ago
I think the title of the link should be changed to: "Lifehacker's list of EVERY How-To Guild from 2012"
- ocean12 14y ago
  I came back to HN to post the exact same thing.
astar 14y ago
Didn't expect that "How to Crack a Wi-Fi Network's Password with Reaver" would be the top guide for lifehackers readers http://lifehacker.com/5873407/how-to-crack-a-wi+fi-networks-wpa-password-with-reaver http://lifehacker.com/5873407/how-to-crack-a-wi+fi-networks-...
nickpp 14y ago
Is anybody still able to follow Lifehacker? Their feed seems to be updated hourly with every single irrelevant tech news of the moment. I don't even know what "life hacker" means to them anymore...
- roldie 14y ago
  Agreed. Lifehacker's usefulness has diminished significantly over the past couple years. Besides the articles, what made Lifehacker so great in the past was its community of smart people willing to share great tips. Many of these people have left, largely due to the horrible design changes pushed by Gawker.
  - patrickk 14y ago
    OP here. Agree completely. The average article quality used to be great there, especially for niche apps/programs, the "hive five" feature, and detailed how-to guides. There's still some great content on there - like you can see in an aggregate article like this one. However, the average article quality has declined significantly. Once Gina Trapiani left, I noticed a drop in quality. The awful, Gawker-pushed redesign hurt too, probably turning away some of the more valuable members who contributed great stuff in the comments like you noted. If lifehacker was an independent entity (or even an autonomous one like Reddit within Conde Nast) it could be fantastic. Not possible while Gawker is pushing it's media properties to a race to the bottom in search of traffic though. Gizmodo has gotten significantly worse too unfortunately.
    - w1ntermute 14y ago
      Are there any sites that have risen to take its place? I think there's a lot of value in a site that does the sort of blogging Lifehacker does, but in a more concise and useful manner (like they used to).
      - roldie 14y ago
        I've seen some of the past top commenters on How-To Geek and Ars Technica forums. But there's nothing that really replicates the old Lifehacker. Reddit's LifeProTips might be good eventually, but there is a significant amount of noise since it isn't curated like a blog.
    - illuminate 14y ago
      "There's still some great content on there" I imagine, but sifting through the content farm-quality junk articles to find those takes away any possible life productivity benefit they would have.
      - patrickk 14y ago
        Usually what I do is google specific things that I know Lifehacker is likely to have good content for: "lifehacker + ThingIWantToDo", e.g. "lifehacker + automated media centre" or "lifehacker + hive five vpn". That throws up the good, older content (sometimes newer/updated content too) without sifting through the crap.
- donniezazen 14y ago
  I used to follow Lifehacker on post by post basis. But then I realized blogs don't help much. So, I closed my Google Reader and stopped reading all blogs. I subscribed most blogs on G+ and receive a handful of posts everyday. Some of their stuff is good and most of it is so simple that it shouldn't have been mentioned. Currently, I have subscribed to Lifehacker's VIP feed which brings whole article to my Google Reader. They have been bringing interesting people through series' like How-I-work and Ask-an-Expert that I feel like missing. I just skip any article that I find to be overkill.
- illuminate 14y ago
  It's vaguely more useful than The Onion's "troublehacking" http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLEE064653669DD57B http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLEE064653669DD57B Also, have their lousy tips ever been "hacking"?
- rhizome 14y ago
  It means "Reddit Copyer."
deleted 14y ago
[deleted]
aes256 14y ago
TL;DR: Snake oil productivity tips and security/privacy hysteria get page views
raju 14y ago
I agree with other HN'ers that LifeHacker has lost a lot of it's appeal - they post waaay too much. I have found myself doing two things 1. Only go to lifehacker once every few days and quickly browse to see if anything catches my eye. 2. Rather than going to lifehacker.com (the new design is absolutely atrocious) I go to blog.lifehacker.com which presents the stories in a chronological order, which makes more sense to me. With that said, this is (IMO) a completely useless collection of how-to guides. Edit: Formatting

96 points by patrickk 14y ago

Nux 14y ago

Wow, lifehacker's site is actually usable now without Javascript. Good job!

jbigelow76 14y ago

I think the title of the link should be changed to: "Lifehacker's list of EVERY How-To Guild from 2012"

ocean12 14y ago
I came back to HN to post the exact same thing.

astar 14y ago

Didn't expect that "How to Crack a Wi-Fi Network's Password with Reaver" would be the top guide for lifehackers readers http://lifehacker.com/5873407/how-to-crack-a-wi+fi-networks-wpa-password-with-reaver http://lifehacker.com/5873407/how-to-crack-a-wi+fi-networks-...

nickpp 14y ago

Is anybody still able to follow Lifehacker? Their feed seems to be updated hourly with every single irrelevant tech news of the moment. I don't even know what "life hacker" means to them anymore...

roldie 14y ago
Agreed. Lifehacker's usefulness has diminished significantly over the past couple years. Besides the articles, what made Lifehacker so great in the past was its community of smart people willing to share great tips. Many of these people have left, largely due to the horrible design changes pushed by Gawker.
- patrickk 14y ago
  OP here. Agree completely. The average article quality used to be great there, especially for niche apps/programs, the "hive five" feature, and detailed how-to guides. There's still some great content on there - like you can see in an aggregate article like this one. However, the average article quality has declined significantly. Once Gina Trapiani left, I noticed a drop in quality. The awful, Gawker-pushed redesign hurt too, probably turning away some of the more valuable members who contributed great stuff in the comments like you noted. If lifehacker was an independent entity (or even an autonomous one like Reddit within Conde Nast) it could be fantastic. Not possible while Gawker is pushing it's media properties to a race to the bottom in search of traffic though. Gizmodo has gotten significantly worse too unfortunately.
  - w1ntermute 14y ago
    Are there any sites that have risen to take its place? I think there's a lot of value in a site that does the sort of blogging Lifehacker does, but in a more concise and useful manner (like they used to).
    - roldie 14y ago
      I've seen some of the past top commenters on How-To Geek and Ars Technica forums. But there's nothing that really replicates the old Lifehacker. Reddit's LifeProTips might be good eventually, but there is a significant amount of noise since it isn't curated like a blog.
  - illuminate 14y ago
    "There's still some great content on there" I imagine, but sifting through the content farm-quality junk articles to find those takes away any possible life productivity benefit they would have.
    - patrickk 14y ago
      Usually what I do is google specific things that I know Lifehacker is likely to have good content for: "lifehacker + ThingIWantToDo", e.g. "lifehacker + automated media centre" or "lifehacker + hive five vpn". That throws up the good, older content (sometimes newer/updated content too) without sifting through the crap.
donniezazen 14y ago
I used to follow Lifehacker on post by post basis. But then I realized blogs don't help much. So, I closed my Google Reader and stopped reading all blogs. I subscribed most blogs on G+ and receive a handful of posts everyday. Some of their stuff is good and most of it is so simple that it shouldn't have been mentioned. Currently, I have subscribed to Lifehacker's VIP feed which brings whole article to my Google Reader. They have been bringing interesting people through series' like How-I-work and Ask-an-Expert that I feel like missing. I just skip any article that I find to be overkill.
illuminate 14y ago
It's vaguely more useful than The Onion's "troublehacking" http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLEE064653669DD57B http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLEE064653669DD57B Also, have their lousy tips ever been "hacking"?
rhizome 14y ago
It means "Reddit Copyer."

deleted 14y ago

[deleted]

aes256 14y ago

TL;DR: Snake oil productivity tips and security/privacy hysteria get page views

raju 14y ago

I agree with other HN'ers that LifeHacker has lost a lot of it's appeal - they post waaay too much. I have found myself doing two things 1. Only go to lifehacker once every few days and quickly browse to see if anything catches my eye. 2. Rather than going to lifehacker.com (the new design is absolutely atrocious) I go to blog.lifehacker.com which presents the stories in a chronological order, which makes more sense to me. With that said, this is (IMO) a completely useless collection of how-to guides. Edit: Formatting