3 ms·
A real shame that they didn't include screenshots of what the results look like. Not only do they note browsers that don't support it yet, they even note that t
by vintagedave 4mo ago
A real shame that they didn't include screenshots of what the results look like. Not only do they note browsers that don't support it yet, they even note that the samples might not survive changes in the future.
So I scrolled, saw a lot of code, nothing showing the result.
- LoganDark 4mo agoThere are a ton of interactive demos for me on Safari 27, and at the top of the article there's also a video. What isn't showing up for you?
- Stitch4223 4mo agoThere is movie at the top that shows three renders of the same thing next to each other so the randomness can easily be spotted.
- mrbluecoat 4mo agoI especially liked the aurora demo. Nice example!
- kilian 3mo agoThe point isn't showing what they look like, it's that the result is randomized. Screenshots aren't, so that kind of defeats the purpose. The article starts with instructions on how to actually see and interact with the demos (the easiest is to use https://polypane.app https://polypane.app ), as well as a video showing all the demos from the article running in Polypane.