3 ms·
> https://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/devin.pope/research/pdf/Website_Marathons.pdf https://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/devin.pope/research/pdf/Web... 404 Not Found
by cadamsdotcom 4mo ago
> https://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/devin.pope/research/pdf/Website_Marathons.pdf https://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/devin.pope/research/pdf/Web...
404 Not Found
Had you tried to read the paper, you’d have noticed the dead link.
How’s the wind up on your high horse?
- SiempreViernes 4mo ago> Runners who were on pace to finish between 3:45 and 3:55 or between 4:05 and 4:15 ran approximately 6%–8% slower in the last 2.195 kilometers. In contrast, runners who were on pace to finish close to the 4-hour mark (3:55–4:02) ran only 4%–6% slower in the last 2.195 kilometers. [...] Panel (b) of Figure 7 zooms out to show this normalized pace for runners across a wider range of 40-kilometer-pace times. The same qualitative pattern around 4 hours is observed at other round numbers in the distribution. Thus, there is clear evidence that runners finish the last 2.195 kilometers relatively faster when they are close to a round number than when they are farther away. From "Reference-Dependent Preferences: Evidence from Marathon Runners" https://devingpope.com/assets/files/Website_Marathons.pdf https://devingpope.com/assets/files/Website_Marathons.pdf Not sure why you think not making any effort to find the article beyond clicking a link is a flex, but ok.