3 ms·
We provide a similar service for Godot instead of Unity, and 20$ plan being exhausted in one prompt on a top model like Opus sounds about right. That's the life
by OsrsNeedsf2P 4mo ago
We provide a similar service for Godot instead of Unity, and 20$ plan being exhausted in one prompt on a top model like Opus sounds about right. That's the life when you pay API prices and can't afford 10x subsidies.
- rtpg 4mo agoIs this true even for more targeted prompts that aren't about looking over an entire codebase or w/e? I just stick to my sub pricing and find good success on targeted requests, but I wonder if I would run up against things even then if not for subsidies.
- delusional 4mo agoOne prompt might be a bit much, but experience shows that $20 is roughly 3 or 4 context windows on GTP-5.5
- deleted 4mo ago[deleted]
- cdurth 4mo agoNot sure if you meant Fable/Mythos instead of Opus, but I can comfortable work several hours a day using Opus on Max-Ultracode on the CC 10x.
- Zababa 4mo agoYes because you don't pay API costs with the Claude Code plans.
- cdurth 4mo agoSure, I understand the subsidization. Their limits are practically unusable and the marketing of "Focused working sessions for regular coding, review, research, and analysis throughout the week." is pretty disingenuous then.
- Zababa 4mo agoI don't think a different way of paying should be considered a subsidy. From what I understand AI companies are making money on those plans. The limits feels really usable to me, but maybe because I've learned to work within their limitations. It's like, it's always possible to consume more tokens for maybe more output.